Al-Hamdolillahi Rabbel-Alameen,
Peace
I will try to address some of the misconceptions of your post and explain the background of the notions, it seems you heard this third hand a bit.
Please clafify me on this issue. I'm an atheist but I believe that in all of the religions in the world, parents are paramount. This eventually gave rise to ancestral worship in many of world religions.
Not true. The first idols were worshiped because they were the leaders of the tribes, and after several generations and people feeling grateful to the heads of their tribes and their statues, they were diverted into worshipping idols.
But there is something peculiar to the teaching of Islam (according to some muslim).
Not really, it's just worked out and buried in judaism and christianity thanks to feminist movements in the West.
The strong relationship of parents and children are only true for their sons. Sons and parents have strong relationship for his entire life, whereas daughters will cease to be related to their parents after they get married.
This was misunderstood completely. Relationship of daughter to parents stay true and just as strong as the son to his. No obligation towards the parents is riscinded. It's just that when marriage is set, then the obedience of a husband becomes a priority over that of the parents, so if the girl's mother for example tells the woman to ignore her husband and go over there, she cannot do so. Daughter's relationship towards her parents is intact.
My muslim friend said that according to Hadith, Muhammad once said that he would ask wives to worship their husband should human worship permitted by Allah.
Yes, kind of, but it was recognition of status and appreciation of his role in life. He said if there was anyone who could or should worship any other, it would be a woman worshipping her husband. That is because he is charged and required to earn and spend on her, care for her, and provide her with shelter, protection, and sustenance. Whatever a woman earns is hers and she's not required to carry any of the burdens.
I personally oppose this type of notion. For me, parents should be revered by all of their children. No particular other person should interrupt the relationship between parents and their children. These notion of cessation of the relationship of daughters to their parents after marriage and “husband worship” are classic example of second class treatment medieval Arabs have towards women. I believe this barbaric tradition then infused into Islam.
Already explained that you misunderstood about the fact that no cessation of relationship is ever introduced, and that you misunderstood. Other than that, we don't appreciate you taking a swing at Islam by using words like "barbaric tradition" or propagate falsehood such as "scond class treatment medieval Arabs have towards women". Your personal shortcomings in comprehending our religion does not give you critique credintials. As for Arab women in medieval times, they were honoured ladies of business and poetry and lived in homes and palaces thriving in an enlightened Islamic nation, while european tribes were still building homes out of cowdung, raiding each other and snatching women and children by the hair to claim as their own JUST to claim women and children as their own, and half the population did not know whether their parents ever married, or did not know their fathers, period.
It is that kind of treatment and society that created the current views of western civilization towards medieval times, what THEY were experiencing in europe. Kindly research and understand matters first before passing judgment along with what can be taken as an insult.